Details

    • Customer:
      Ooreedo Tunisia
    1. Missing Lat Long For Site Id.xlsx
      10 kB
      Indrasan Yadav
    2. Missing Site Id_Huawei_129 Nodes.xlsx
      2.68 MB
      Indrasan Yadav
    3. OT_Huawei_RAN All Nodes_Physical.docx
      1.67 MB
      Indrasan Yadav
    4. Require Site ID & Lat-Long_Huawei_19-08-2025.xlsx
      21 kB
      Indrasan Yadav

      Activity

      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Checked sample dump eNodeB for site id parsing rule and it is founded in dump but will conclude once other sample damp received from customer and also waiting for any clarification regarding site data information from customer end as discussed in last meeting on 12-06-2025.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Checked sample dump eNodeB for site id parsing rule and it is founded in dump but will conclude once other sample damp received from customer and also waiting for any clarification regarding site data information from customer end as discussed in last meeting on 12-06-2025.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      As discussed with Bassem Sabbagh we need to parse site id based on sample and parse the same in NEP.

      Once customer will share full dump & any information regarding site data then we will amendment the same accordingly.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - As discussed with Bassem Sabbagh we need to parse site id based on sample and parse the same in NEP. Once customer will share full dump & any information regarding site data then we will amendment the same accordingly.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Now, site id is parsing correctly in XML based on given data in static sheet SM, and imported the same XML in NEP and also site id is coming correctly there.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Now, site id is parsing correctly in XML based on given data in static sheet SM, and imported the same XML in NEP and also site id is coming correctly there.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Checked the site naming convention rule which is shared by customer on 16-07-2025 over the sharepoint.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Checked the site naming convention rule which is shared by customer on 16-07-2025 over the sharepoint.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Which need to be raised to Ooredoo for Huawei_RAN.

      1- There are 22 site Ids which are available in file "CM_RAN_july" but has incorrect/missing Lat/Long.
      2- There are 129 nodes whose site id are not available in file "CM_RAN_july"

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Which need to be raised to Ooredoo for Huawei_RAN. 1- There are 22 site Ids which are available in file "CM_RAN_july" but has incorrect/missing Lat/Long. 2- There are 129 nodes whose site id are not available in file "CM_RAN_july"
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited

      Final sheet is attached which need to be raised to Ooredoo for missing site id & Lat-Long.

      File name: Require Site ID & Lat-Long_Huawei_19-08-2025

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited Final sheet is attached which need to be raised to Ooredoo for missing site id & Lat-Long. File name: Require Site ID & Lat-Long_Huawei_19-08-2025
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Hi Jharna Thakur,

      Please find the attached FRS: (OT_Huawei_RAN All Nodes_Physical_20-08-2025), which details the rules to parse the Site ID for all node types for Huawei RAN.

      I’ve also shared the same via email for your reference.

      Please implement the parsing logic as specified in the FRS.

      Share back the XML along with the CSV output generated from the parsed Site IDs.

      If you have any queries or need clarifications, let me know.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Hi Jharna Thakur , Please find the attached FRS: (OT_Huawei_RAN All Nodes_Physical_20-08-2025), which details the rules to parse the Site ID for all node types for Huawei RAN. I’ve also shared the same via email for your reference. Please implement the parsing logic as specified in the FRS. Share back the XML along with the CSV output generated from the parsed Site IDs. If you have any queries or need clarifications, let me know.
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - - edited

      WIP with OT-17 and both might be delivered by 22-8

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - - edited WIP with OT-17 and both might be delivered by 22-8
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      delayed and to be delivered on 25-8 the first half

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - delayed and to be delivered on 25-8 the first half
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      XML to be shared shortly on 25-8

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - XML to be shared shortly on 25-8
      Hide
      Jharna Thakur added a comment -

      xml shared

      Show
      Jharna Thakur added a comment - xml shared
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited

      Site Ids are parsing based on naming convention rule in given xml. (2025-08-25-02.33.48_Ooredoo)

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited Site Ids are parsing based on naming convention rule in given xml. (2025-08-25-02.33.48_Ooredoo)
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Dear Jharna Thakur,

      As discussed please parse the site id for BSC/RNC as same node name of them. and share the revised XML with using of updated sheet "Site Data Information".

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Dear Jharna Thakur , As discussed please parse the site id for BSC/RNC as same node name of them. and share the revised XML with using of updated sheet "Site Data Information".
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      WIP and to be delivered by today EOD

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - WIP and to be delivered by today EOD
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      will be delivered by today EOD

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - will be delivered by today EOD
      Hide
      Jharna Thakur added a comment -

      xml shared

      Show
      Jharna Thakur added a comment - xml shared
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Now, sites are parsing for BSC/RNC as per given rule.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Now, sites are parsing for BSC/RNC as per given rule.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Hello @Jharna Thakur,

      Please review and implement the following updated rule to parse the Site ID, as per the customer requirement for micro site.

      Rule:
      If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has 2 as the 4th character, and the next three digits after 2 are greater than 600, then subtract 600 from those last three digits.

      This rule is applicable to all node types; however, it is currently observed in SRAN nodes only.

      Example: Attached

      • Node Name: SFX2612
      • Rule Applied: After the 4th character 2, the next three digits are 611 (>600), so subtract 600 → 012
      • Derived Site ID: SFX2012

      Please let me know once this is implemented or if any clarification is required.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Hello @Jharna Thakur, Please review and implement the following updated rule to parse the Site ID, as per the customer requirement for micro site. Rule: If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has 2 as the 4th character, and the next three digits after 2 are greater than 600, then subtract 600 from those last three digits. This rule is applicable to all node types; however, it is currently observed in SRAN nodes only. Example: Attached • Node Name: SFX2612 • Rule Applied: After the 4th character 2, the next three digits are 611 (>600), so subtract 600 → 012 • Derived Site ID: SFX2012 Please let me know once this is implemented or if any clarification is required.
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      WIP and XML to be shared on 26-12

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - WIP and XML to be shared on 26-12
      Hide
      Jharna Thakur added a comment -

      xml shared

      Show
      Jharna Thakur added a comment - xml shared
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      XML validated locally but CSV output was not uploaded due to latest AI patch deployment pending, now it is deployed and CSV output is shared by Jharna to Basant for upload it on staging-DB. Once upload done I will check & validate it on staging-DB.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - XML validated locally but CSV output was not uploaded due to latest AI patch deployment pending, now it is deployed and CSV output is shared by Jharna to Basant for upload it on staging-DB. Once upload done I will check & validate it on staging-DB.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Jharna Thakur please commit the code for same.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Jharna Thakur please commit the code for same.
      Hide
      Jharna Thakur added a comment -

      code committed

      Show
      Jharna Thakur added a comment - code committed
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Dear @Jharna Thakur,

      Please find the validation feedback below based on staging-DB and csv output generated on server & uploaded by Basant:

      Importer ID: "20251231015405_2025-12-31-01.54.05"

      The site ID is now parsing correctly based on the defined micro site rule. Kindly review and confirm the following priority order:

      1. First priority: Site matching
      2. Second priority: Naming convention rule

      Please confirm if this priority logic is correctly implemented.

      As I can see, for the below nodes that fall under “site matching”, the parsing is still being done based on the naming convention rule, which should not be the case:

      (I) BSC HW TB
      (II) BSCSOS51 TEST BED
      (III) RNCTBMGH

      Kindly review and correct this so that these nodes follow the site matching logic as intended.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Dear @Jharna Thakur, Please find the validation feedback below based on staging-DB and csv output generated on server & uploaded by Basant: Importer ID: "20251231015405_2025-12-31-01.54.05" The site ID is now parsing correctly based on the defined micro site rule. Kindly review and confirm the following priority order: 1. First priority: Site matching 2. Second priority: Naming convention rule Please confirm if this priority logic is correctly implemented. As I can see, for the below nodes that fall under “site matching”, the parsing is still being done based on the naming convention rule, which should not be the case: (I) BSC HW TB (II) BSCSOS51 TEST BED (III) RNCTBMGH Kindly review and correct this so that these nodes follow the site matching logic as intended.
      Hide
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment -

      WIP and WL to be be defined by Jharna

      Show
      Bassem Sabbagh added a comment - WIP and WL to be be defined by Jharna
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited

      Hi Jharna Thakur,

      I have corrected the Site ID parsing rules as per the customer requirement and have attached the updated FRS for your reference.

      Updated Site ID Parsing Rules

      1- If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has the 4th character as 2, and the next three digits are greater than or equal to 600, then subtract 600 from the last three digits.
      (This logic is already implemented for values greater than 600; please extend it to cover the equal to 600 condition as well) (Applicable to all node types, though currently observed only in SRAN)

      2- If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has the 4th character as 2, and the next three digits are greater than or equal to 500, then subtract 50 from the last three digits.
      (Applicable only to NodeB)

      3- In all cases, if the value extracted after the special character has the 4th digit as 2 and the next three digits are less than 600, the extracted value itself should be considered as the Site ID (This is finding in SRAN: Example-MBTS-Ste_SOPAT_MAH2010)

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - - edited Hi Jharna Thakur , I have corrected the Site ID parsing rules as per the customer requirement and have attached the updated FRS for your reference. Updated Site ID Parsing Rules 1- If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has the 4th character as 2, and the next three digits are greater than or equal to 600, then subtract 600 from the last three digits. (This logic is already implemented for values greater than 600; please extend it to cover the equal to 600 condition as well) (Applicable to all node types, though currently observed only in SRAN) 2- If the value extracted from the node name (before or after the special characters _ or -) has the 4th character as 2, and the next three digits are greater than or equal to 500, then subtract 50 from the last three digits. (Applicable only to NodeB) 3- In all cases, if the value extracted after the special character has the 4th digit as 2 and the next three digits are less than 600, the extracted value itself should be considered as the Site ID (This is finding in SRAN: Example-MBTS-Ste_SOPAT_MAH2010)
      Hide
      added a comment - - edited

      csv output shared to upload it in db. Indrasan Yadav sir can check in db after upload

      Show
      added a comment - - edited csv output shared to upload it in db. Indrasan Yadav sir can check in db after upload
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Hi Jharna,

      Now the sites are parsing correctly as per the given rule.
      Please go ahead and commit the code for the same.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Hi Jharna, Now the sites are parsing correctly as per the given rule. Please go ahead and commit the code for the same.
      Hide
      Jharna Thakur added a comment -

      code committed

      Show
      Jharna Thakur added a comment - code committed
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Latest patch deployed on server, to be check data on staging-DB.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Latest patch deployed on server, to be check data on staging-DB.
      Hide
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment -

      Now, all site ids are correctly parsing as per given rule & confirmed by Ooredoo.

      Show
      Indrasan Yadav added a comment - Now, all site ids are correctly parsing as per given rule & confirmed by Ooredoo.

        People

        • Assignee:
          Indrasan Yadav
          Reporter:
          Indrasan Yadav
        • Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          3 Start watching this issue

          Dates

          • Due:
            Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved:
            Planned Start:
            Planned End:
            Actual Start:
            Actual End:
            Date of Baselining:

            Time Tracking

            Estimated:
            Original Estimate - Not Specified
            Not Specified
            Remaining:
            Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
            0m
            Logged:
            Time Spent - 2 weeks, 1 day, 4 hours
            2w 1d 4h