[LS-1001] Layout Seems Something Different From Normal_Nokia RAN Created: 12/Mar/26  Updated: 18/Mar/26  Due: 20/Mar/26  Resolved: 13/Mar/26

Status: Cancelled
Project: L3 Support
Component/s: NEP
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Urgent
Reporter: Indrasan Yadav Assignee: Indrasan Yadav
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: AI_All_incidents, Nokia_RAN_OO
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent: 2 hours, 30 minutes
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: PNG File Board Snippet Where Port Is Already Added.png     PNG File Layout Snippet.png     PNG File No Error Snippet.png    
Customer:
Ooreedo Tunisia
Planned Start:
Planned End:
Actual Start:
Date of Baselining:

 Description   

Dear @Hassan Abdine,

I am facing an issue in Nokia RAN within NEP related to the layout.

Earlier, I added the missing ports to all Nokia boards. After adding them, I verified the Inventory Report using a sample case, and all the newly added ports were displayed correctly.

However, after importing the updated XML file shared by the AI DEV team, I noticed an issue. Once the import was completed, I checked the Physical Reports (Inventory/Cabinet/Shelf/Boards), but the report values were showing as null, and the layout was appearing blank.

I raised this issue with the NEP DEV team through JIRA LS-990. After deploying the latest NEP patch, the issue related to opening the report and displaying the layout was resolved. However, all ports are still not appearing in the layout, even though they have been added to the boards. It seems there might be a synchronization issue or another underlying problem.

Could you please review this from your side and provide your suggestions?

For your reference, please see the required snippet:
For node BAR1037, on slot 7 and 8, the board is FBBC. In the catalogue, this board has 6 ports, whereas in the layout only 3 ports are appearing.

Better if we can connect over teams to show you & explain you.

Best regards,
Indrasan



 Comments   
Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 13/Mar/26 ]

After discussion with Hassan, now issue has been fixed as there was an issue related to check/uncheck in model for old view only.

Generated at Wed Apr 15 14:28:55 EEST 2026 using JIRA 6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaedef2e4a625c6c7183698b2468d4719c20dc.