[LS-589] Old inventory for Active nodes are not removed - cells not updating Created: 21/Aug/25  Updated: 14/Apr/26  Due: 09/Jan/26  Resolved: 06/Feb/26

Status: Ready for QA
Project: L3 Support
Component/s: NEP
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug
Reporter: Priyasha Tiwari Assignee: Priyasha Tiwari
Resolution: Not Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: nep_dev
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent: 1 week, 4 days, 1 hour
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: File 2025-09-24-01.52.02_AirTel.xml_45.tgz     PNG File OLD INVENTORY 2.png     PNG File OLD INVENTORY PB.png     PNG File old inventory PB 5g Node.png     PNG File old inventory img sample2.png     PNG File old inventory xml sample 2.png     File server.log.2026-03-10_KK.tgz     File server.log.2026-03-11_KK.tgz     File server.log.2026-03-12_KK.tgz    
Issue Links:
Relates
relates to LS-918 kk circle 4g cell deleted and reinser... Closed
Customer:
Airtel India
Planned Start:
Planned End:
Defect Category: Implementation
Actual Start:
Date of Baselining:

 Description   

most of the data almost from all the reports, subelemts are not getting imported in the xml file but they are still showing in the NEP report .as a part for import over import process these data should ideally be delete from the records if not getting imported .. wee need to clean up all these from the inventory



 Comments   
Comment by Hassan Abdine [ 22/Aug/25 ]

what is the change date if parent NEs Core, RAN, etc ?

Comment by Basant Kumar [ 22/Aug/25 ]

https://mobinets-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/basant_kumar_nuiva_com/Eegc4u6qBWtNtY4GrT4WzbABLxsDdcnA4XtnfH2hQMRhjw?e=uwZRxv

https://mobinets-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/basant_kumar_nuiva_com/EciuB4M0BK1AsaxhnmYaWJMBfKFhMsUvHMTiQcixor7hgg?e=F8yS2j

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 01/Sep/25 ]

As you can see in the Screenshot the parent site LUK15I for the highlighted board is not present in NEP.

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 03/Sep/25 ]

As checked the parent node of board is coreelement LUC-GMT-5GSM-MME-03 which is present in NEP also updatedon 22-02-2025,also the parent site LUK15I is also present in HP circle. Hence the board existing in NEP. During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation of related physical configuration. Attaching screen shot.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 04/Sep/25 ]

We found an issue in the JK circle. In the SRANBS report, the same node is appearing twice on is getting updated while the other is not. Due to this, the respective boards are also not getting updated, and board are appearing in the laTEST XML. If the node not present in the XML had been deleted, the new board elements would have been updated. so the "import over import" logic is not working correctly and needs to be checked.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 04/Sep/25 ]

refer the error snap

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 05/Sep/25 ]

the sample case shared of JK no longer in NEP when checked. also @Priyasha as discussed please inform if the other node deletion needed to be included in api deletion for deletion.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 24/Sep/25 ]

Hi, A new sample case from the Punjab Circle has been shared. The gNodeB LUD240 is updating, and six cells are mapped under this node. However, only two cells are getting updated and are reflected in the XML data. The remaining four cells, although mapped to this node, are not updating and are also not getting parsed in the XML .

Ideally, these unmapped cells should be automatically deleted during the import-over-import process. Please review this sample node and share the Root Cause Analysis on top priority.

all the screenshot are attached.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 02/Oct/25 ]

new sample case attached for working, @khaled Khalil please check with L3 if not occupied in some priority 0 task then proceed to work on this .

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 07/Oct/25 ]

HI Dear as explained During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation...it doesnt delete any data during import over import. If deletion is required please raise a CR jira for same.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 08/Oct/25 ]

How can we clean up the entries that are not getting imported into the XML, even though their parent nodes are updating? This cannot be done through API, as we need to remove these sub-elements...

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 08/Oct/25 ]

@hassan please suggest, for new sample SS refer the latest date one

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 30/Oct/25 ]

as discussed on call, refer to the screenshot attached for PB circle and check the configuration for cell report

Comment by Anonymous [ 10/Dec/25 ]

Please provide a new sample case

Comment by Anonymous [ 12/Dec/25 ]

HP-NLBDUN01-1 new sample from Hp circle , please check this sample on priority and same HP DB is connected to test .37

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 09/Jan/26 ]

released build 3.7.71.546 with implementation of deletion of non updating cell of 2g,3g,4g,5g.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 19/Jan/26 ]

hi Srishti, we need detailed explanation on the implementation we did to rectify this bug please share

Comment by Anonymous [ 30/Jan/26 ]

Hi Dear as explained implemention is regarding the deletion of cell and its sub-elements which are in NEP but not present in xml.

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 05/Feb/26 ]

Hi dear Build 3.7.71.555 is released containing changes only a week older cells will be deleted if they are not coming in xml.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 06/Feb/26 ]

as discussed ,The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 06/Feb/26 ]

The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 11/Feb/26 ]

Hi,
Build 3.7.71.558 has been released with the changes mentioned in the trailing email.
The property npt.conf.cell.deletion.duration.days=7 has been added in the tr_configuration.properties file to support dynamic duration configuration.

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 23/Mar/26 ]

hi as discussed this logic is not working as required for KK circle. where the connector huwaei import is done on alternate days and as we can see around 14k cells are deleting which are inactive and mainly of Huawei m2000 connector .

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 23/Mar/26 ]

not ok

Comment by Abir Messaikeh [ 25/Mar/26 ]

same as LS-918

Comment by Khaled Khalil [ 14/Apr/26 ]

Hi,
this must be closed as LS-918 is closed

Thanks

Generated at Fri Apr 17 10:34:03 EEST 2026 using JIRA 6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaedef2e4a625c6c7183698b2468d4719c20dc.