[LS-700] POP Sites Missing in Site Report Created: 10/Sep/25  Updated: 10/Nov/25  Due: 10/Sep/25  Resolved: 10/Nov/25

Status: Rejected
Project: L3 Support
Component/s: NEP
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug
Reporter: Priyasha Tiwari Assignee: Priyasha Tiwari
Resolution: Cancelled Votes: 0
Labels: NEP_D
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent: 6 hours
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: Microsoft Excel RFS_DATA_v20.xlsx     PNG File Screenshot 2025-10-15 132449.png     PNG File Screenshot 2025-10-15 153620.png     PNG File Screenshot 2025-10-15 153834.png     PNG File Screenshot 2025-10-15 160039.png     PNG File Screenshot 2025-10-15 160615.png     PNG File pop site missing in site report.png     PNG File pop site missing in site report1.png     PNG File pop site missing in site report2.png    
Customer:
Airtel India
Planned Start:
Planned End:
Rejected By: Khaled Khalil
Actual Start:
Date of Baselining:

 Description   

as observed the site mentioned in SS for delhi circle 2369_DL is reflecting as a POP site in RFS data and add info data but as we can see that in the site report the category for this site is showing as blank , ideally it should reflect as a pop site .

 Comments   
Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 10/Sep/25 ]

I have asked the L2 team to share the XML for this sample cases, once recieve the same will upload here

Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 07/Oct/25 ]

RFS DATA DUMP IS SHARED

Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 15/Oct/25 ]

Hi Dear,
As checked for the sample case shared (Site: 22369_DL), the site is not reflecting as a PoP site because the required details are missing in the XML.
For a site to be considered as a PoP site, it must have:
• Site category: PoP in the XML
• M6Code: Present in aadinfo within the XML
These fields are missing in the provided case.
Attaching screenshots for your reference — one for the sample case and another for a valid PoP site.

Generated at Fri Apr 17 08:11:17 EEST 2026 using JIRA 6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaedef2e4a625c6c7183698b2468d4719c20dc.