[#LS-729] Vendor Name Is Appearing Incorrect In 2G Cell Report

[LS-729] Vendor Name Is Appearing Incorrect In 2G Cell Report Created: 17/Oct/25 Updated: 22/Oct/25 Due: 31/Oct/25 Resolved: 22/Oct/25
Status:	Rejected
Project:	L3 Support
Component/s:	NEP
Affects Version/s:	None
Fix Version/s:	None

Type:

Bug

Priority:

Normal

Reporter:

Indrasan Yadav

Assignee:

Indrasan Yadav

Resolution:

Done

Votes:

Labels:

AI_All_incidents, Huawei_RAN_OO, Nokia_RAN_OO

Remaining Estimate:

0 minutes

Time Spent:

6 hours

Original Estimate:

Not Specified

Attachments:

2G Cell report.png

2G Cell report_2nd.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 153205.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 153835.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 154013.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 154135.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 154409.png

Screenshot 2025-10-20 160112.png

ranooredoo 1.rar

server logs.rar

Customer:

Ooreedo Tunisia

Planned Start:

31/Oct/25 12:00 AM

Planned End:

31/Oct/25 12:00 AM

Rejected By:

Marwan Kanaan

Actual Start:

17/Oct/25 12:00 AM

Date of Baselining:

17/Oct/25 12:45 PM

Description

Dear @Khaled Khalil,

Could you please assign an NEP DEV resource to check and fix the below issue:

XML File: 2025-09-26-05.01.22_Ooredoo (Attached on JIRA)
Import Date: 17-10-2025
Platform: .102
Server Logs: Attached on JIRA

After importing the above XML today (related to ~~LS-687~~), I validated the data in NEP and noticed a new issue that was not present before this import.

In the 2G Cell Report, the vendor name is appearing incorrectly for the node BSC-415338 / BCF-29.

Snap attached

This node belongs to Nokia, but in the report, the vendor is shown as Huawei.

Kindly have this checked and corrected.

Thank you
Indrasan

Comments

Comment by Marwan Kanaan [ 22/Oct/25 ]

Dear @Indrasan Yadav,

Kindly note that the issue is not reproducible on my local environment, as the data is being inserted correctly, as shown below.

I recommend importing the XML file 2025-10-03-10.37.53_Ooredoo.xml, since the one you mentioned earlier does not contain any of the referenced 2G cells.

Additionally, during debugging, I noticed a difference in the BTS model type.
In the actual version, the BTS type is BTS3900_GSM (Huawei), while in my local is setup to SRAN NSN_GSM.

SS
SS
SS

Please find the relevant snapshots from the XML you provided below.

Best Regards,

Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer

Generated at Wed Apr 15 16:11:08 EEST 2026 using JIRA 6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaedef2e4a625c6c7183698b2468d4719c20dc.

[LS-729] Vendor Name Is Appearing Incorrect In 2G Cell Report Created: 17/Oct/25 Updated: 22/Oct/25 Due: 31/Oct/25 Resolved: 22/Oct/25