[LS-78] Boards Are Importing On Different Shelf_Nokia Created: 18/Dec/24 Updated: 10/Jan/25 Due: 20/Dec/24 Resolved: 10/Jan/25 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | L3 Support |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | Indrasan Yadav | Assignee: | Indrasan Yadav |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | AI_All_incidents, ZAINKSAAUDIT, ZAINKSAUAT | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | 0 minutes | ||
| Time Spent: | 2 days, 6 hours, 30 minutes | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Customer: |
Zain KSA 3.X
|
||||||||
| Planned Start: | |||||||||
| Planned End: | |||||||||
| Actual Start: | |||||||||
| Date of Baselining: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
Dear @Khaled Khalil, Could you please assign a DEV resource to check and fix the issue mentioned below? Total 1192 boards of node type BSC only are not being imported into NEP, and there is no error reports related to this issue. While the total board count (146 for node BSC-394126 for example) matches between XML and NEP for node type BSC (BSC-394126), the issue is that some boards are correctly mapped to their respective cabinet, shelf, and slot, while others are appearing on different shelves in NEP. For reference, I am sharing an example for one BSC (BSC-394126) with one board type (EMB): XML Snippet: NEP Snippet: However, in NEP, it is showing in cabinet-1, shelf-5, and slots 26/27. Best regards, |
| Comments |
| Comment by Mustapha Al-Hage [ 26/Dec/24 ] |
|
Dear @Indrasan Yadav, After exploring the XML, we have found the following: • The nodeBoard "BSC-394126_1_1_27_0" has a nodeSlot "BSC-394126_1_1_27". When checking this slot in the XML, its shelf XML ID is listed as "iCQK1" • If you check the “iCQK1” shelf XML id, you find that the shelf associated with this id is “BSC-394126_1_5 • Meanwhile, the correct XML ID for the shelf "BSC-394126_1_1" is "i3_O1" In conclusion, the shelf XML ID "iCQK1" used in the nodeSlot should be replaced with the correct ID "i3_O1." Regards, |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 26/Dec/24 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, Please check below issue, where shelf is not coming correctly in node slot for BSC node. Thanks// |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 30/Dec/24 ] |
|
xml to be delivered by EOD |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 31/Dec/24 ] |
|
delivered |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 31/Dec/24 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, As discussed, please share the full XML using the latest dump that I have already provided to you. Additionally, kindly check because the cabinet type/shelf type is missing for the eNodeB. Also, please clarify how "FXEB/FRGT/FAN" are appearing in the cabinet type and shelf type when these are not actual cabinets. Once you share the full XML as per the latest dump, I will review it. Best regards, |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 31/Dec/24 ] |
|
To be delivered in 1-2 hour !! |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 03/Jan/25 ] |
|
xml shared on teams |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 03/Jan/25 ] |
|
Hi Juned, Please note that the shelf index is currently showing as "0" for BSC, whereas it should be "1." This issue was correctly reflected in the earlier XML as well. Could you please check and fix this? I am attaching here the snippet for your reference. Thank you. |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 06/Jan/25 ] |
|
Hi indrasan i used new dumps you shared to generate xml after which i found this issue on using old dump it is coming correct !! |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 06/Jan/25 ] |
|
XML AND CSV SHASRED FOR MENTIONED ISSUE |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 06/Jan/25 ] |
|
Hi Juned, as discussed please share updated XML after taking updated code as ZKU-221 issue is again showing because you didn't taken updated code. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 07/Jan/25 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, As discussed, please find below snippet where we can see the difference in shelf id. In first column cabinet & shelf is appearing 1 but in column ‘D’ it is appearing shelf ‘5’ in most cases. Please check & fix the same. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 07/Jan/25 ] |
|
to be delivered on 7-1 |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 08/Jan/25 ] |
|
its ssems it is csv bug because i cannot find this issue in xml |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 08/Jan/25 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, Please disregard this email for I have discussed this with @Ahad Siddiqui, and we have confirmed that this rule should be removed. (FRS is attached for your reference) Please generate a fresh full XML for Nokia after removing this rule. Thanks, |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 08/Jan/25 ] |
|
again a change then again new issue could be created because of this . please avoid it getting hectic |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 08/Jan/25 ] |
|
xml and csv shared !! |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 09/Jan/25 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, Please commit the code for same. Best regards, |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 10/Jan/25 ] |
|
Dear @Juned Ali, Could you please commit the code for same, so we can close this JIRA. Best regards, |
| Comment by Juned Ali [ 10/Jan/25 ] |
|
code commited ++ |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 10/Jan/25 ] |
|
We are now closing this child JIRA as it pertains to an individual issue. As suggested by @Ahad, all code commit JIRAs will be covered under the parent JIRA. |