[OT-83] Connector Name Should Be Parse As Available In FRS Created: 29/Sep/25  Updated: 07/Jan/26  Due: 03/Oct/25  Resolved: 07/Jan/26

Status: Closed
Project: Ooredoo Tunisia
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Normal
Reporter: Indrasan Yadav Assignee: Indrasan Yadav
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: AI_All_incidents, Huawei_RAN_OO, Nokia_RAN_OO
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent: 4 days, 5 hours, 30 minutes
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: PNG File Huawei RAN_Connector Name.png     Microsoft Excel OT-83 (Nokia RAN).xlsx     Microsoft Word OT_Huawei_RAN All Nodes_Physical.docx     Microsoft Word OT_NSN_RAN_FRS_All Node Type_Physical.docx     File csv-output_huawei-ran.rar     File csv-output_nsn-ran.rar    
Customer:
Ooreedo Tunisia
Planned Start:
Planned End:
Actual Start:
Actual End:
Date of Baselining:

 Description   

Dear All,

As discussed, the connector names need to be parsed exactly as defined in the FRS, and they should remain unique per project for both Nokia_RAN and Huawei_RAN.

I have updated the FRS accordingly, and the finalized connector names are as follows (Which is generally parse under header “importerConnector”):

• Huawei RAN: Huawei_RAN_Ooredoo_TUN
• Nokia RAN: NSN_RAN_Ooredoo_TUN

Currently, it is parsing as below:

Huawei RAN: Huawei_M2000 (Snippet attached)
Nokia RAN: Header is missing

@Bassem Sabbagh, please advise if these names need to be revised and guide us further on this.

Best regards,
Indrasan



 Comments   
Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 29/Sep/25 ]

Dear Bassem Sabbagh,

I have created a common JIRA for this issue. Kindly assign an AI DEV resource to investigate and resolve it.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 30/Sep/25 ]

Assigned to Ashutosh to define the WL ... WIP

Comment by Ashutosh Shendye [ 30/Sep/25 ]

Both Huawei and NSN ran csv-outputs attached with suggested names.
Note: I have only changed the existing importer connector nothing else.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 06/Oct/25 ]

Hi Sandya,

As discussed, the Importer ID and Importer Connector are still missing in almost all tables in the CSV output.

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 06/Oct/25 ]

XML shared.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 13/Oct/25 ]

Hi Sandya,

Please check the attached excel sheet where I have mentioned the parsing connector name and need to check where it is parsing incorrect.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 13/Oct/25 ]

Sandhya to define the WL

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 13/Oct/25 ]

WL is half day.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 14/Oct/25 ]

to be delivered in 14-10 the first half

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 15/Oct/25 ]

It is done , but as discussed with indrasan he said that upload the csv after fix all the issue related to jira OT-84.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 15/Oct/25 ]

ticket to be assigned to Indrasan and CSVs to be shared with integration and to be loaded in SD

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 16/Oct/25 ]

csv-output shared with integration and uploaded in staging db.

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 16/Oct/25 ]

importor connector name is not mendatory for each csv , it is discussed with driss sir, and for addinfo or error alarm we are using the common code for each connector, there is error coming for others connector while i change the code for addinfo , we can fix it by change in each connnector seperatly.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 22/Oct/25 ]

Dear @Sandya Sharma,

Please find the validation remarks: (Green-Fixed, Blue-Ignore, without any colour-To be check)

I consider the latest one Importer Id=’20251016091426_2025-10-16-09.14.26’

Updated list (OT-83 (Nokia RAN) is attached for your reference.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 29/Oct/25 ]

to be fixed by 29-10

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 30/Oct/25 ]

csv output shared with integration

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 04/Nov/25 ]

Hi Sandya, could you please confirm if Integration has uploaded it? I am unable to find any email regarding this.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 04/Nov/25 ]

As confirmed this is included in the CSV output which is shared for OT-84.

Bassem Sabbagh in meantime please assign this to Jharna Thakur to fix for Huawei RAN.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 04/Nov/25 ]

Jharna to define the WL ... started on 4-11

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 05/Nov/25 ]

WIP and to be delivered by 5-11

Comment by Jharna Thakur [ 07/Nov/25 ]

Done with this, will share the CSV output with the resolution for OT-85.

Comment by Jharna Thakur [ 10/Nov/25 ]

CSVs are shared with integration

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 11/Nov/25 ]

Hi @Sandya Sharma,

Please find latest validation feedback for Importer Connector for Nokia RAN:

Consider Importer ID: 20251107090325_2025-11-07-09.03.25

Still Importer Connector is not correct for below tables:

CSV-Output Table Name
NodeInterface
RadioAntenna
SubInterface
ElementCell5g
ElementCellRadioBandWidth
ElementTrx
LogicalInterface

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 12/Nov/25 ]

Please check the updated data and confirm.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 13/Nov/25 ]

Hi @Sandya Sharma,

Please find below validation feedback for latest importer id: 20251111023300_2025-11-11-02.33.00

Still Importer Connector is not correct for below tables:

CSV-Output Table Name
NodeInterface
SubInterface
ElementCell5g
ElementTrx

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 13/Nov/25 ]

WIP and to be fixed by 13-11

Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 14/Nov/25 ]

CSV output shared with integration.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 26/Dec/25 ]

1- Nokia RAN:

Connector name is parsing OK in all possible tables except below which can be ignored:
(II) Site
(III) Error alarm

2- Huawei RAN:

Connector name is parsing OK in all possible tables except below:
(II) Site
(III) Error alarm
(IV) Sub interface: Missing somewhere in table (To be check by Jharna Thakur

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 30/Dec/25 ]

Hi Jharna Thakur please commit the code for connector name missing issue in Huawei RAN for table "Sub interface" as it is fixed now withing OT-45 CSV output.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 02/Jan/26 ]

Hi Jharna,

The issue was initially identified in the Sub Interface table, where the importer connector was missing. You had fixed this earlier. However, while validating the latest data on the server using the importer ID 20251231015405_2025-12-31-01.54.05 (shared by Basant on 31-12-2025), I noticed that the importer connector issue is now appearing in additional tables as well either it is missing or incorrect 'Huawei_M2000'.

The following tables are affected, even though they were previously fixed (except for Sub Interface):

1- BATCH_ELEMENT_CELL_RADIO_BAND_WIDTH
2- BATCH_ELEMENT_GSM_CELL_MAIO
3- BATCH_ELEMENT_TRX
4- BATCH_ELEMENT_TRX_ARFCN
5- BATCH_IP_DATA
6- BATCH_LOGICAL_INTERFACE
7- BATCH_NETWORK_ELEMENT_DUMP
8- BATCH_NODE_INTERFACE
9- BATCH_RADIO_ANTENNA
10- BATCH_SUB_INTERFACE
11- BATCH_VIRTUAL_INTERFACE

Kindly review and fix the importer connector issue for the above tables as well.

Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 06/Jan/26 ]

XML and CSVs are generated with no issues on local laptop of Jharna ... it could be integration issue ... L2 to generate again the XML and share it for validation ...

Comment by Jharna Thakur [ 07/Jan/26 ]

I have checked the staging database and the issues have now been resolved.
Previously, the Omantel connector was executed instead of the Ooredoo Huawei RAN connector, which caused the discrepancy. This has been corrected.

Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 07/Jan/26 ]

Now, issue has been fixed for both connector Nokia RAN (Already fixed earlier) & Huawei RAN (Now fixed):

Connector name is parsing OK in all possible tables except below which can be ignored:
(II) Site
(III) Error alarm

2- Huawei RAN:

Connector name is parsing OK in all possible tables except below:
(II) Site
(III) Error alarm

Generated at Wed Apr 15 14:30:50 EEST 2026 using JIRA 6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaedef2e4a625c6c7183698b2468d4719c20dc.