[OT-84] Nokia RAN Data Validation In Staging-DB Created: 29/Sep/25 Updated: 23/Jan/26 Due: 30/Nov/25 Resolved: 23/Jan/26 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Ooredoo Tunisia |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | Indrasan Yadav | Assignee: | Indrasan Yadav |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | AI_All_incidents, Nokia_RAN_OO | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | 0 minutes | ||
| Time Spent: | 4 weeks, 3 days, 1 hour, 30 minutes | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Customer: |
Ooreedo Tunisia
|
| Planned Start: | |
| Planned End: | |
| Actual Start: | |
| Actual End: | |
| Date of Baselining: |
| Description |
|
Dear @Driss Chibane, Could you please confirm the following points that I observed during data validation in the staging-DB for Nokia RAN: 1. On checking randomly across some tables for nodes like BSC/RNC/SRAN/BTS/NodeB/eNodeB, I found: o Only the RNC table exists, but its data is blank (While data is available in CSV-Output). My question is: since we validated all the CSVs earlier, under which table names and locations in the staging-DB should each dataset be available? It would be very helpful if you could share a mapping/list that clearly describes which CSV data corresponds to which tables in S-DB. (Element_Node snippet) (RNC snippet) Thank you |
| Comments |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 30/Sep/25 ] |
|
From: Bassem Sabbagh <bassem.sabbagh@mobinets.com> Dear Indrasan, It should be the other way around. You need to share with Driss or Sandya the list of all CSVs that you are unable to map them with staging DB tables and they will share the tables name. Thanks |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 30/Sep/25 ] |
|
Dear @Sandya Sharma, Please review my comments below and confirm. You may add your inputs against each question mark for clarification. (List attached) Note: I have considered all CSV files for Huawei and Nokia RAN. Best regards, |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 01/Oct/25 ] |
|
Dear @Sandya Sharma, As discussed, I reviewed the CSV-Output files you shared with me yesterday and found a few points that require your confirmation: 1. Duplicate Headers in CSV-Output Tables Sr. No. CSV-Output File Name Duplicate Duplicate headers name 2- Missing Node/Parent Mapping in IPData File Thank you |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 06/Oct/25 ] |
|
WIP by Sandya and to provide her feedback by 6-10 |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 07/Oct/25 ] |
|
Data to be validated only in SD not in CSV |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 14/Oct/25 ] |
|
Dear @Sandya Sharma, Please find below the S-DB XML data validation feedback based on the parsed tables. Kindly review and share your comments or clarifications. There are three categories under which the validation feedback has been summarized: A. Data should be parsed – please verify and fix, as corresponding rules are already available in FRS. 1- Site: 2- Addinfo: ID (should be parse) 3- BTS: BTS (should be parse) 4- BSC: Parent MSC 5- 2G Cell: Element name (Should be parse) 6- 3G Cell: Element name (Should be parse) 7- 4G Cell: Element name (should be parse) 8- 5G Cell: 9- NodeB: LAC (should be parse) 10- Board: Change date 11- SRAN: External code (Should be parse) 12- RNC Operator (Should be parse) 13- Error alarm: Element ID (Should be parse) 14- IP Data: Network interface name 15- Logical Interface: (Table is not updated based on importer ID) 16- Cabinet: Site (Should be parse) 17- Node interface: 18- Shelf: Manufacturer name (Should be parse) 19- Slot: Serial version UID 20- Antenna: Element node id (Should be parse) 21- Sub interface: Route map 22- Cell radio bandwidths/eNodeB Bandwidths/ Cell tracking area: 23- Role2G: BTS (Should be parse) 24- Role3G: LAC (Should be parse) 25- Role4G: IP Address 26- Role5G: IP Address Thank you |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 14/Oct/25 ] |
|
Dear Bassem Sabbagh As discussed, I have attached the updated sheet "Table Comparison". The items highlighted in yellow still require clarification, while those marked in green have already been clarified by #Sandya. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 14/Oct/25 ] |
|
Sandya Sharma please do the following as discussed: 1- the attached excel sheet should be finalized with Indrasan and all cells in column F should be filled with SD DB table name |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 15/Oct/25 ] |
|
WL is 1.5 day. |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 16/Oct/25 ] |
|
as discussed with driss sir for this point where extra headers are coming and it is having no value in it , we can not remove them because may be they can use in other connectors so we can not remove them. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 16/Oct/25 ] |
|
To be completed by today |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 17/Oct/25 ] |
|
delayed and to be delivered by 17-10 as Sandya is off the next week |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 17/Oct/25 ] |
|
shared the data to basant for upload on staging db. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 22/Oct/25 ] |
|
Dear @Basant Kumar, Please confirmed here once CSV Output upload is complete which is shared by @Sandya Sharma. Still CSV Output is not uploaded on staging-DB. Thank you |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 27/Oct/25 ] |
|
Table remarks: |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 28/Oct/25 ] |
|
To be started on 28-10 |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 29/Oct/25 ] |
|
will fix it by today. |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 30/Oct/25 ] |
|
csv output shared to integartion. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 04/Nov/25 ] |
|
Hi Sandya, As discussed, I will validate the CSV output uploaded by Integration yesterday for the pending issues which were highlighted earlier and share feedback for same once done. In the meantime, please address the below points: 1) Duplicate Cell ID & Name conflict with Huawei RAN (Reference JIRA: Append “_1” for the first cell’s ID and Name, and increment +1 subsequently for the next duplicates. 2) BSC IP not imported due to incorrect parsing of BSC Name instead of BSC ID in loopback interface (Reference JIRA: Name objectId |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 04/Nov/25 ] |
|
will fix by today. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 04/Nov/25 ] |
|
WIP and to be delivered by 4-11 |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 04/Nov/25 ] |
|
Hi @Sandya Sharma, Please find the validation remarks based on Importer ID “20251103115411_2025-11-03-11.54.11”. In the first email of this thread, the items highlighted in yellow indicate the issues that have been fixed, while the items highlighted in blue indicate the issues that are still pending / not yet fixed. Note: As discussed with #Driss, items except in blue and yellow can be ignored for now, based on your confirmation. Thank you |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 05/Nov/25 ] |
|
for the upper comment which having import issue , xml has been shared. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 05/Nov/25 ] |
|
WL to be defined by Sandya ..to be started on 5-11 |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 06/Nov/25 ] |
|
will fix this and |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 07/Nov/25 ] |
|
for |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 11/Nov/25 ] |
|
Hi Sandya, I will review the data in S-DB for Additionally, please provide an update on the following points I highlighted with you last week: 1- Logical table not updated (Did you checked with Driss or not? if checked please update on same) |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 11/Nov/25 ] |
|
hi indrasan please check the mail on 7-11 for the above issues. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 11/Nov/25 ] |
|
Hi @Sandya Sharma, As discussed, I have reviewed the latest data uploaded by @Basant Kumar on the S-DB for Nokia RAN. Please refer to my latest comment, highlighted in green with today’s date, in the initial thread email and below as well. These items are still unresolved and need to be fixed. Consider Importer ID: 20251107090325_2025-11-07-09.03.25 8. 5G Cell: : 15. Logical Interface: (Table is not updated based on importer ID) Not Fixed 11-11: Still same 19. Slot: 21. Sub interface: 22. Cell radio bandwidths/eNodeB Bandwidths/ Cell tracking area: 23. Role2G: New Issues: 1- Total boards are 30589 and now 30083 are updating only which was Ok in previous Importer ID. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 13/Nov/25 ] |
|
WIP and to be fixed by 13-11 |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 14/Nov/25 ] |
|
XML shared. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 26/Dec/25 ] |
|
Please find below the validation feedback based on the latest CSV output that was shared earlier for validation. The validation could not be completed at that time due to my involvement in another internal DEMO task. Importer ID: 20251114121417_2025-11-14-12.14.17 8. 5G Cell (I) MIMO Configuration / RET Tilt are partial parsing. The MIMO Configuration and RET Tilt headers are currently NULL/None, whereas they should be parsed correctly for all where it is available in dump. A reference snippet is attached for clarity. Snippet-1_26-12-2025 (II) Missing Headers: UP–DN Link Bandwidth (Not Fixed) Please review and address the above points. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 29/Dec/25 ] |
|
WL = 1 mday ... to be started on 29-12 the second half |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 30/Dec/25 ] |
|
to be delivered by 30-12 the first half |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 31/Dec/25 ] |
|
code committed , after patch release integration will generate the xml for nsn and then validate the data in SD. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 05/Jan/26 ] |
|
Hi Sandya, After the latest patch was deployed, the integration team generated and uploaded the CSV output to the staging DB with the importer ID 20251231121137_2025-12-31-12.11.37. I have validated this output, and my observations are as follows: Validation Findings 1- The Operator field is blank in BTS. 4- The eNodeB bandwidth count has changed from 13,826 previously to 2,938 currently. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 06/Jan/26 ] |
|
to be started on 6-1 |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 07/Jan/26 ] |
|
for the loopback interface issue dump is missing on server. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 07/Jan/26 ] |
|
Only point # 4 is pending and to be concluded after we conclude the use of static files |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 08/Jan/26 ] |
|
Point no. 6 is still pending. Additionally, radio antenna details are now missing in the XML. In the previous version, radio antenna data was available, and only the elementNodeId header was missing. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 09/Jan/26 ] |
|
Sandya to add more logs as the issue is not reproducible on DEV laptop |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 12/Jan/26 ] |
|
added logs , after patch release will check the logs and will fix then issue. |
| Comment by Bassem Sabbagh [ 13/Jan/26 ] |
|
Logs are added as per Driss email |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 14/Jan/26 ] |
|
added the logs as per suggested by driss sir , but still they are not coming on server , mailed about it to driss sir. |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 15/Jan/26 ] |
|
now radio anteena data is coming in xml, xml shared on mail already , working on the second issue.. |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 19/Jan/26 ] |
|
done some changes in the code for enodebbandwidth data , check the data in csv and confirm then will check the data on sd. |
| Comment by Sandya Sharma [ 20/Jan/26 ] |
|
now enodbandwidth data is coming fine in the csv , please check and confirm. |
| Comment by Indrasan Yadav [ 23/Jan/26 ] |
|
A separate JIRA ( Validation for all these changes will be performed under JIRA Currently, uplink/downlink channel bandwidth and uplink/downlink EARFCN are still not importing into NEP due to the following error: “The parent EnodeB LNBTS-515143 of LTE Cell (515143_22) has no supported TDD bands.” under "4G Cell". Although TDD band information is available in the XML, this issue is not being raised to the DEV team at this stage, as it will be validated based on the latest rules and parsing logic under Therefore, closing JIRA |