http://jira.mobinets.com/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 6.1.4 6159 19-11-2013 http://jira.mobinets.com/jira/browse/ACE-616 ACE <p>getProcessVariableValue is having Performance issue 0.06s versus 2.3s</p> <p>&lt;soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ser="http://server.api.nep.mobinets.com/"&gt;<br/> &lt;soapenv:Header/&gt;<br/> &lt;soapenv:Body&gt;<br/> &lt;ser:getProcessVariableValue&gt;<br/> &lt;!-<del>Optional:</del>-&gt;<br/> &lt;woNo&gt;4444000164&lt;/woNo&gt;<br/> &lt;!-<del>Optional:</del>-&gt;<br/> &lt;variableName&gt;AppType&lt;/variableName&gt;<br/> &lt;/ser:getProcessVariableValue&gt;<br/> &lt;/soapenv:Body&gt;<br/> &lt;/soapenv:Envelope&gt;</p> ACE-616

getProcessVariableValue is having Performance issue 0.06s versus 2.3s

Bug Urgent Rejected Cancelled Mbaye Lo Mbaye Lo Thu, 26 Feb 2026 14:35:48 +0200 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 04:57:59 +0200 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 04:57:59 +0200 FN Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0200 0 2 <p>same code executed in both systems.<br/> difference in performance due to flowable database size difference .<br/> in staging platform we made flowable database cleanup (FN_80)<br/> while in flowable database of 84 platform we didn't .<br/> find below comparaison between just 2 tables used when retrieving process variable both systems :<br/> old : ACT_RU_EXECUTION (35583) | ACT_RU_VARIABLE (475868)<br/> new : ACT_RU_EXECUTION (1113420) | ACT_RU_VARIABLE (12192874)</p> Customer Dev. Actual Duration Gantt Options Last Comment <p style="display:inline"><b>Evaluation License Error:</b> EXPIRED</p> Original Estimate PDM Actual Duration Planned End Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Planned Start Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Rank 0|xtixu1: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Rejected By zTrabelsi VTDirections