L3 Support
  1. L3 Support
  2. LS-566

OT | Naming Convention issue for SDH Nodes

        Details

        • Type: Bug Bug
        • Status: QA In Progress QA In Progress (View Workflow)
        • Priority: Normal Normal
        • Resolution: Unresolved
        • Component/s: NEP
        • Labels:
          None Labels
        • Customer:
          OMAN-Tel
        • Complexity:
          High
        • REQUESTER:
          INTERNAL

          Description

          It is found that, there are few naming Convention rules which are not working for SDH nodes. Please find below details.

          In below details, I have shared the naming rule for the Models with sample NEs for which the error occured.

          WDM Ciena Ciena6500 s(D)<>siteID<>counter<>s<>s(6500)<>s<>alphaCounter
          DB000101-6500-SOHAR
          DB000200-6500-SAH2
          DB000300-6500-SUWAIQ

          ADM Huawei 155/622 s(S)<>siteID<>counter<>s<>s(Metro2050)<>s<>alphaCounter
          SB000113-Metro2050-SOH
          SB029000-Metro2050
          SD000105-Metro2050-SAL
          SD000106-Metro2050-SAL2

          ADM Huawei M3100 s(S)<>siteID<>counter<>s<>s(Metro3100)<>s<>counter
          SB000201-Metro3100
          SB000303-Metro3100-SUW
          SB000401-Metro3100-Khab
          SD000103-Metro3100-SAL2
          SD000104-Metro3100-SAL2

          WDM Huawei M6040V2 s(D)<>siteID<>counter<>s<>s(Metro6040V2)<>s<>counter
          DB000110-Metro6040V2-SOH
          DB000204-Metro6040V2-SAHAM
          DB000304-Metro6040V2-SUW
          DB000306-Metro6040V2-SUW

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            5 older comments
            Hide
            Permalink
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment -

            Naming convention changed as suggested. Will check the result.

            Show
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment - Naming convention changed as suggested. Will check the result.
            Hide
            Permalink
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment -

            @Marwan, As checked, still same issue occurred. Please check again.

            Show
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment - @Marwan, As checked, still same issue occurred. Please check again.
            Hide
            Permalink
            Marwan Kanaan added a comment - - edited

            Dear @Aurobinda Panda,

            The names and zone names don’t match. Either the zone names should be in uppercase for Sohar, Saham, and Suwaiq, or you can choose to ignore the mismatched ones as this is a normal case due to naming convention variations for these nodes.

            Also, how do you expect SUW to match SUWAIQ_3G?

            Best Regards,
            Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer

            Show
            Marwan Kanaan added a comment - - edited Dear @Aurobinda Panda, The names and zone names don’t match. Either the zone names should be in uppercase for Sohar, Saham, and Suwaiq, or you can choose to ignore the mismatched ones as this is a normal case due to naming convention variations for these nodes. Also, how do you expect SUW to match SUWAIQ_3G? Best Regards, Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer
            Hide
            Permalink
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment -

            Dear @marwan,
            As per your suggestions naming convention rules changed. But if still issue is not resolved, so the suggestions are not relevant. atleast one of the NEs should have updated with the suggested rule. but it didn't happen.

            So instead of Zone, can't we use counter as a static value.

            Kindly confirm.

            Show
            Aurobinda Panda added a comment - Dear @marwan, As per your suggestions naming convention rules changed. But if still issue is not resolved, so the suggestions are not relevant. atleast one of the NEs should have updated with the suggested rule. but it didn't happen. So instead of Zone, can't we use counter as a static value. Kindly confirm.
            Hide
            Permalink
            Marwan Kanaan added a comment -

            dear @aurobinda

            kindly know that you can set counter as a static value but non of the above names going to be working.

            regards,

            Show
            Marwan Kanaan added a comment - dear @aurobinda kindly know that you can set counter as a static value but non of the above names going to be working. regards,
            Cancel

              People

              • Assignee:
                Aurobinda Panda
                Reporter:
                Aurobinda Panda
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Due:
                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Planned Start:
                  Planned End:
                  Actual Start:
                  Date of Baselining:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
                  0m
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 1 day, 7 hours, 10 minutes
                  1d 7h 10m

                    Drag and Drop