Details

    • Customer:
      Airtel India
    • Defect Category:
      Implementation

      Description

      most of the data almost from all the reports, subelemts are not getting imported in the xml file but they are still showing in the NEP report .as a part for import over import process these data should ideally be delete from the records if not getting imported .. wee need to clean up all these from the inventory

      1. 2025-09-24-01.52.02_AirTel.xml_45.tgz
        29.87 MB
        Priyasha Tiwari
      2. server.log.2026-03-10_KK.tgz
        1.15 MB
        Priyasha Tiwari
      3. server.log.2026-03-11_KK.tgz
        193 kB
        Priyasha Tiwari
      4. server.log.2026-03-12_KK.tgz
        5.42 MB
        Priyasha Tiwari
      1. OLD INVENTORY 2.png
        19 kB
      2. old inventory img sample2.png
        17 kB
      3. OLD INVENTORY PB.png
        24 kB
      4. old inventory PB 5g Node.png
        35 kB
      5. old inventory xml sample 2.png
        18 kB

      Issue Links

        Activity

        Hide
        Hassan Abdine added a comment -

        what is the change date if parent NEs Core, RAN, etc ?

        Show
        Hassan Abdine added a comment - what is the change date if parent NEs Core, RAN, etc ?
        Show
        Basant Kumar added a comment - https://mobinets-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/basant_kumar_nuiva_com/Eegc4u6qBWtNtY4GrT4WzbABLxsDdcnA4XtnfH2hQMRhjw?e=uwZRxv https://mobinets-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/basant_kumar_nuiva_com/EciuB4M0BK1AsaxhnmYaWJMBfKFhMsUvHMTiQcixor7hgg?e=F8yS2j
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        As you can see in the Screenshot the parent site LUK15I for the highlighted board is not present in NEP.

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - As you can see in the Screenshot the parent site LUK15I for the highlighted board is not present in NEP.
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited

        As checked the parent node of board is coreelement LUC-GMT-5GSM-MME-03 which is present in NEP also updatedon 22-02-2025,also the parent site LUK15I is also present in HP circle. Hence the board existing in NEP. During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation of related physical configuration. Attaching screen shot.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited As checked the parent node of board is coreelement LUC-GMT-5GSM-MME-03 which is present in NEP also updatedon 22-02-2025,also the parent site LUK15I is also present in HP circle. Hence the board existing in NEP. During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation of related physical configuration. Attaching screen shot.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        We found an issue in the JK circle. In the SRANBS report, the same node is appearing twice on is getting updated while the other is not. Due to this, the respective boards are also not getting updated, and board are appearing in the laTEST XML. If the node not present in the XML had been deleted, the new board elements would have been updated. so the "import over import" logic is not working correctly and needs to be checked.

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - We found an issue in the JK circle. In the SRANBS report, the same node is appearing twice on is getting updated while the other is not. Due to this, the respective boards are also not getting updated, and board are appearing in the laTEST XML. If the node not present in the XML had been deleted, the new board elements would have been updated. so the "import over import" logic is not working correctly and needs to be checked.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        refer the error snap

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - refer the error snap
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited

        the sample case shared of JK no longer in NEP when checked. also @Priyasha as discussed please inform if the other node deletion needed to be included in api deletion for deletion.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited the sample case shared of JK no longer in NEP when checked. also @Priyasha as discussed please inform if the other node deletion needed to be included in api deletion for deletion.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        Hi, A new sample case from the Punjab Circle has been shared. The gNodeB LUD240 is updating, and six cells are mapped under this node. However, only two cells are getting updated and are reflected in the XML data. The remaining four cells, although mapped to this node, are not updating and are also not getting parsed in the XML .

        Ideally, these unmapped cells should be automatically deleted during the import-over-import process. Please review this sample node and share the Root Cause Analysis on top priority.

        all the screenshot are attached.

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - Hi, A new sample case from the Punjab Circle has been shared. The gNodeB LUD240 is updating, and six cells are mapped under this node. However, only two cells are getting updated and are reflected in the XML data. The remaining four cells, although mapped to this node, are not updating and are also not getting parsed in the XML . Ideally, these unmapped cells should be automatically deleted during the import-over-import process. Please review this sample node and share the Root Cause Analysis on top priority. all the screenshot are attached.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        new sample case attached for working, @khaled Khalil please check with L3 if not occupied in some priority 0 task then proceed to work on this .

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - new sample case attached for working, @khaled Khalil please check with L3 if not occupied in some priority 0 task then proceed to work on this .
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment -

        HI Dear as explained During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation...it doesnt delete any data during import over import. If deletion is required please raise a CR jira for same.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - HI Dear as explained During import over import process only creation and updation of Nodes and there respective sub elements. Also as the respective node is not present in xml hence there is no updation...it doesnt delete any data during import over import. If deletion is required please raise a CR jira for same.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - - edited

        How can we clean up the entries that are not getting imported into the XML, even though their parent nodes are updating? This cannot be done through API, as we need to remove these sub-elements...

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - - edited How can we clean up the entries that are not getting imported into the XML, even though their parent nodes are updating? This cannot be done through API, as we need to remove these sub-elements...
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - - edited

        @hassan please suggest, for new sample SS refer the latest date one

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - - edited @hassan please suggest, for new sample SS refer the latest date one
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        as discussed on call, refer to the screenshot attached for PB circle and check the configuration for cell report

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - as discussed on call, refer to the screenshot attached for PB circle and check the configuration for cell report
        Hide
        added a comment -

        Please provide a new sample case

        Show
        added a comment - Please provide a new sample case
        Hide
        added a comment -

        HP-NLBDUN01-1 new sample from Hp circle , please check this sample on priority and same HP DB is connected to test .37

        Show
        added a comment - HP-NLBDUN01-1 new sample from Hp circle , please check this sample on priority and same HP DB is connected to test .37
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited

        released build 3.7.71.546 with implementation of deletion of non updating cell of 2g,3g,4g,5g.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - - edited released build 3.7.71.546 with implementation of deletion of non updating cell of 2g,3g,4g,5g.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        hi Srishti, we need detailed explanation on the implementation we did to rectify this bug please share

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - hi Srishti, we need detailed explanation on the implementation we did to rectify this bug please share
        Hide
        added a comment -

        Hi Dear as explained implemention is regarding the deletion of cell and its sub-elements which are in NEP but not present in xml.

        Show
        added a comment - Hi Dear as explained implemention is regarding the deletion of cell and its sub-elements which are in NEP but not present in xml.
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment -

        Hi dear Build 3.7.71.555 is released containing changes only a week older cells will be deleted if they are not coming in xml.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - Hi dear Build 3.7.71.555 is released containing changes only a week older cells will be deleted if they are not coming in xml.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        as discussed ,The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - as discussed ,The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - The release 555 was validating the insert date of cells for deletion, which is incorrect. Ideally, we should be referring to the update date of cells associated with active nodes. If these cells are not present in the XML for a week, they should be deleted. Additionally, the one-week condition should be configurable rather than hardcoded.
        Hide
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment -

        Hi,
        Build 3.7.71.558 has been released with the changes mentioned in the trailing email.
        The property npt.conf.cell.deletion.duration.days=7 has been added in the tr_configuration.properties file to support dynamic duration configuration.

        Show
        Srishti Kashyap added a comment - Hi, Build 3.7.71.558 has been released with the changes mentioned in the trailing email. The property npt.conf.cell.deletion.duration.days=7 has been added in the tr_configuration.properties file to support dynamic duration configuration.
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        hi as discussed this logic is not working as required for KK circle. where the connector huwaei import is done on alternate days and as we can see around 14k cells are deleting which are inactive and mainly of Huawei m2000 connector .

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - hi as discussed this logic is not working as required for KK circle. where the connector huwaei import is done on alternate days and as we can see around 14k cells are deleting which are inactive and mainly of Huawei m2000 connector .
        Hide
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment -

        not ok

        Show
        Priyasha Tiwari added a comment - not ok
        Hide
        Abir Messaikeh added a comment -

        same as LS-918

        Show
        Abir Messaikeh added a comment - same as LS-918
        Hide
        Khaled Khalil added a comment -

        Hi,
        this must be closed as LS-918 is closed

        Thanks

        Show
        Khaled Khalil added a comment - Hi, this must be closed as LS-918 is closed Thanks

          People

          • Assignee:
            Priyasha Tiwari
            Reporter:
            Priyasha Tiwari
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Due:
              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Planned Start:
              Planned End:
              Actual Start:
              Date of Baselining:

              Time Tracking

              Estimated:
              Original Estimate - Not Specified
              Not Specified
              Remaining:
              Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
              0m
              Logged:
              Time Spent - 1 week, 4 days, 1 hour
              1w 4d 1h

                Drag and Drop