Details

    • Customer:
      Ooreedo Tunisia

      Description

      Dear @Khaled Khalil,

      Could you please assign an NEP DEV resource to check and fix the below issue:

      XML File: 2025-09-26-05.01.22_Ooredoo (Attached on JIRA)
      Import Date: 17-10-2025
      Platform: .102
      Server Logs: Attached on JIRA

      After importing the above XML today (related to LS-687), I validated the data in NEP and noticed a new issue that was not present before this import.

      In the 2G Cell Report, the vendor name is appearing incorrectly for the node BSC-415338 / BCF-29.

      Snap attached

      This node belongs to Nokia, but in the report, the vendor is shown as Huawei.

      Kindly have this checked and corrected.

      Thank you
      Indrasan

      1. ranooredoo 1.rar
        23.36 MB
        Indrasan Yadav
      2. server logs.rar
        593 kB
        Indrasan Yadav
      1. 2G Cell report_2nd.png
        112 kB
      2. 2G Cell report.png
        70 kB
      3. Screenshot 2025-10-20 153205.png
        42 kB
      4. Screenshot 2025-10-20 153835.png
        32 kB
      5. Screenshot 2025-10-20 154013.png
        25 kB
      6. Screenshot 2025-10-20 154135.png
        36 kB
      7. Screenshot 2025-10-20 154409.png
        54 kB
      8. Screenshot 2025-10-20 160112.png
        16 kB

        Activity

        Indrasan Yadav logged work - 17/Oct/25 12:00 AM
        • Time Spent:
          1 hour
           

          During validation find an issue and highlighted to NEP DEV with proper snap server logs.

        Marwan Kanaan logged work - 17/Oct/25 12:00 AM
        • Time Spent:
          1 hour
           

          trying to reproduce the issue and looking in the reports logic

        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Gantt Options Milestone (set to milestone: having a due date but zero effort)
        Planned Start 2025-10-31 24:00 (milestone: set planned start date to due date)
        Planned End 2025-10-31 24:00 (milestone: set planned end date to due date)
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Description Dear @Khaled Khalil,

        Could you please assign an NEP DEV resource to check and fix the below issue:

        XML File: 2025-09-26-05.01.22_Ooredoo (Attached on JIRA)
        Import Date: 17-10-2025
        Platform: .102
        Server Logs: Attached on JIRA

        After importing the above XML today (related to LS-687), I validated the data in NEP and noticed a new issue that was not present before this import.

        In the 2G Cell Report, the vendor name is appearing incorrectly for the node BSC-415338 / BCF-29.
         

        Snap attached
         

        This node belongs to Nokia, but in the report, the vendor is shown as Huawei.

        Kindly have this checked and corrected.


        Thank you
        Indrasan

        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Attachment 2G Cell report_2nd.png [ 120008 ]
        Attachment 2G Cell report.png [ 120009 ]
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Attachment ranooredoo 1.rar [ 120010 ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Component/s NEP [ 16200 ]
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Attachment server logs.rar [ 120011 ]
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Remaining Estimate 0 minutes [ 0 ]
        Time Spent 1 hour [ 3600 ]
        Worklog Id 280764 [ 280764 ]
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Baseline Start 2025-10-31 24:00 (set baseline based of initial work logging)
        Baseline End 2025-10-31 24:00 (set baseline based of initial work logging)
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Time Spent 1 hour [ 3600 ] 2 hours [ 7200 ]
        Worklog Id 280770 [ 280770 ]
        Marwan Kanaan logged work - 20/Oct/25 12:00 AM
        • Time Spent:
          3 hours
           

          Investigated the issue and debugged both the local and actual versions to identify the differences. Found that the mentioned XML does not contain any of the referenced 2G cells. During debugging, also noticed that the BTS type differs between the two versions for the responsible BTS. Recommended importing the XML containing valid data to proceed with verification.

        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Assignee Khaled Khalil [ kkhalil ] Marwan Kanaan [ mkanaan ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Status Open Bug [ 10108 ] Dev Scheduled [ 10014 ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Status Dev Scheduled [ 10014 ] Implementation in progress [ 10016 ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Status Implementation in progress [ 10016 ] Dev Paused [ 10017 ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Time Spent 2 hours [ 7200 ] 5 hours [ 18000 ]
        Worklog Id 280938 [ 280938 ]
        Indrasan Yadav logged work - 22/Oct/25 12:00 AM
        • Time Spent:
          1 hour
           

          Checked feedback received from Marwan & validate in NEP.

        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Status Dev Paused [ 10017 ] Implementation in progress [ 10016 ]
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 153205.png [ 120303 ]
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 153835.png [ 120304 ]
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 154013.png [ 120305 ]
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 154135.png [ 120306 ]
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 154409.png [ 120307 ]
        Attachment Screenshot 2025-10-20 160112.png [ 120308 ]
        Hide
        Marwan Kanaan added a comment -

        Dear @Indrasan Yadav,

        Kindly note that the issue is not reproducible on my local environment, as the data is being inserted correctly, as shown below.

        I recommend importing the XML file 2025-10-03-10.37.53_Ooredoo.xml, since the one you mentioned earlier does not contain any of the referenced 2G cells.

        Additionally, during debugging, I noticed a difference in the BTS model type.
        In the actual version, the BTS type is BTS3900_GSM (Huawei), while in my local is setup to SRAN NSN_GSM.

        SS
        SS
        SS

        Please find the relevant snapshots from the XML you provided below.

        SS

        Best Regards,

        Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer

        Show
        Marwan Kanaan added a comment - Dear @Indrasan Yadav, Kindly note that the issue is not reproducible on my local environment, as the data is being inserted correctly, as shown below. I recommend importing the XML file 2025-10-03-10.37.53_Ooredoo.xml, since the one you mentioned earlier does not contain any of the referenced 2G cells. Additionally, during debugging, I noticed a difference in the BTS model type. In the actual version, the BTS type is BTS3900_GSM (Huawei), while in my local is setup to SRAN NSN_GSM. SS SS SS Please find the relevant snapshots from the XML you provided below. SS Best Regards, Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer
        Marwan Kanaan made changes -
        Status Implementation in progress [ 10016 ] Rejected [ 10100 ]
        Assignee Marwan Kanaan [ mkanaan ] Indrasan Yadav [ iyadav ]
        Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
        Indrasan Yadav made changes -
        Time Spent 5 hours [ 18000 ] 6 hours [ 21600 ]
        Worklog Id 281142 [ 281142 ]
        Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
        Open Bug Open Bug Dev Scheduled Dev Scheduled
        3d 12m 1 Marwan Kanaan 20/Oct/25 12:38 PM
        Dev Scheduled Dev Scheduled Implementation in progress Implementation in progress
        9s 1 Marwan Kanaan 20/Oct/25 12:38 PM
        Implementation in progress Implementation in progress Dev Paused Dev Paused
        3s 1 Marwan Kanaan 20/Oct/25 12:38 PM
        Dev Paused Dev Paused Implementation in progress Implementation in progress
        1d 20h 41m 1 Marwan Kanaan 22/Oct/25 9:20 AM
        Implementation in progress Implementation in progress Rejected Rejected
        2m 1s 1 Marwan Kanaan 22/Oct/25 9:22 AM
        Subversion JIRA

        Links Hierarchy

         Documentation

        Invalid license: EXPIRED

          People

          • Assignee:
            Indrasan Yadav
            Reporter:
            Indrasan Yadav
            Rejected By:
            Marwan Kanaan
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Due:
              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Planned Start:
              Planned End:
              Actual Start:
              Date of Baselining:

              Time Tracking

              Estimated:
              Original Estimate - Not Specified
              Not Specified
              Remaining:
              Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
              0m
              Logged:
              Time Spent - 6 hours
              6h

                Drag and Drop