Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status:
Rejected
(View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Normal
-
Resolution: Cancelled
-
Component/s: NEP
-
Labels:
-
Customer:Ooreedo Tunisia
Description
Dear @Khaled Khalil,
Could you please assign a NEP DEV resource to investigate the issue described below?
Details:
• XML Files:
• Huawei RAN: 2025-09-26-05.01.22_Ooredoo (attached on JIRA-Imported 2nd)
• Nokia RAN: 2025-10-03-10.37.53_Ooredoo (attached on JIRA-Imported 1st)
• Import Date: 24-Oct-2025
• Platform: .102
• Server Logs: I will attach on JIRA, once received from Integration as they are facing some issue on BO machine.
Issue Summary:
During the XML import and validation process, it was observed that six 4G cells are duplicated between the Nokia and Huawei RAN XMLs. However, their parent node ID and node name differ.
Investigation Findings:
• While analysing the Huawei RAN XML in NEP, I found no issues within the XML itself — all 4G cells are importing correctly.
• If the Nokia RAN XML is imported first, all 4G cells appear as expected. However, upon importing the Huawei RAN XML, the same six 4G cells reappear under Huawei RAN and are removed from Nokia RAN.
Nokia RAN
SS attached
Huawei RAN
SS attached
• Based on my observation, there might be a missing condition related to the parent node ID or node name when the cell name and cell ID are duplicated.
• No relevant errors are logged in the Network Reports Importer.
Kindly review this and assign a developer to check and resolve the issue.
Thank you
Indrasan
Attachments
Activity
-
- Time Spent:
- 30 minutes
-
Find the issue during data validation in NEP & raise to NEP DEV.
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt Options | Milestone (set to milestone: having a due date but zero effort) | |
| Planned Start | 2025-10-31 24:00 (milestone: set planned start date to due date) | |
| Planned End | 2025-10-31 24:00 (milestone: set planned end date to due date) |
| Attachment | Nokia RAN_XML.rar [ 120619 ] | |
| Attachment | Huawei RAN_XML.rar [ 120620 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 0 minutes [ 0 ] | |
| Time Spent | 30 minutes [ 1800 ] | |
| Worklog Id | 281774 [ 281774 ] |
| Baseline Start | 2025-10-31 24:00 (set baseline based of initial work logging) | |
| Baseline End | 2025-10-31 24:00 (set baseline based of initial work logging) |
| Component/s | NEP [ 16200 ] |
| Assignee | Khaled Khalil [ kkhalil ] | Marwan Kanaan [ mkanaan ] |
| Description |
Dear @Khaled Khalil,
Could you please assign a NEP DEV resource to investigate the issue described below? Details: • XML Files: • Huawei RAN: 2025-09-26-05.01.22_Ooredoo (attached on JIRA-Imported 2nd) • Nokia RAN: 2025-10-03-10.37.53_Ooredoo (attached on JIRA-Imported 1st) • Import Date: 24-Oct-2025 • Platform: .102 • Server Logs: I will attach on JIRA, once received from Integration as they are facing some issue on BO machine. Issue Summary: During the XML import and validation process, it was observed that six 4G cells are duplicated between the Nokia and Huawei RAN XMLs. However, their parent node ID and node name differ. Investigation Findings: • While analysing the Huawei RAN XML in NEP, I found no issues within the XML itself — all 4G cells are importing correctly. • If the Nokia RAN XML is imported first, all 4G cells appear as expected. However, upon importing the Huawei RAN XML, the same six 4G cells reappear under Huawei RAN and are removed from Nokia RAN. Nokia RAN SS attached Huawei RAN SS attached • Based on my observation, there might be a missing condition related to the parent node ID or node name when the cell name and cell ID are duplicated. • No relevant errors are logged in the Network Reports Importer. Kindly review this and assign a developer to check and resolve the issue. Thank you Indrasan |
-
- Time Spent:
- 2 hours
-
checked the xml and the code logic. the object id and the name for the six ltecell are the same and will be considered the same
| Status | Open Bug [ 10108 ] | Rejected [ 10100 ] |
| Assignee | Marwan Kanaan [ mkanaan ] | Indrasan Yadav [ iyadav ] |
| Resolution | Cancelled [ 10100 ] |
| Time Spent | 30 minutes [ 1800 ] | 2 hours, 30 minutes [ 9000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282066 [ 282066 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1 hour
-
Review the email feedback which received from @Marwan & raised to #Sandya to fix the same with updated FRS in JIRA
OT-84after discussion done with her for the same.
| Time Spent | 2 hours, 30 minutes [ 9000 ] | 3 hours, 30 minutes [ 12600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282558 [ 282558 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282558 [ 282558 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282558 [ 282558 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282558 [ 282558 ] |
| Worklog Id | 282558 [ 282558 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times | Last Executer | Last Execution Date | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1d 14h 55m | 1 | Marwan Kanaan | 29/Oct/25 5:23 AM |
|
Links Hierarchy |
 Documentation
|
Dear @indrasan,
Kindly note that both XML files contain the same Object IDs and names for the six LTE Cells.
As per the code logic, these values should be unique therefore, the six cells are considered identical, which is causing the issue.
Best Regards,
Marwan Kanaan I Software Developer