[LS-615] Duplicate object ID for UBR nodes Created: 01/Sep/25 Updated: 27/Feb/26 Due: 03/Sep/25 Resolved: 27/Feb/26 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | L3 Support |
| Component/s: | NEP |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | CR | Priority: | Urgent |
| Reporter: | Priyasha Tiwari | Assignee: | Srishti Kashyap |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | nep_dev | ||
| Σ Remaining Estimate: | 0 minutes | Remaining Estimate: | 0 minutes |
| Σ Time Spent: | 2 days, 1 hour, 30 minutes | Time Spent: | 2 days, 1 hour, 30 minutes |
| Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Attachments: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Sub-Tasks: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Customer: |
Airtel India
|
|||||||||||||||
| Planned Start: | ||||||||||||||||
| Planned End: | ||||||||||||||||
| Actual Start: | ||||||||||||||||
| Date of Baselining: |
| Description |
|
Duplicate node IDs for MW nodes have been observed, specifically for UBR nodes (i.e., Cambium). As discussed with the customer, for operational reasons they do not want any changes in the existing ID/Object ID column. After analysis with the product team, we finalized that a new column, referred to as Object ID, needs to be created with unique values for NEP functioning. sharing one sample id from delhi circle for working..2401:4900:0:134:0:877:0:341, 2401:4900:0:134:0:877:0:342 That is why this issue is coming, multiple links are available for different OEM with duplicate IP, whereas only one node is imported in network element report. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 16/Sep/25 ] |
|
As agreed we need to implement the below mentioned points. 1- in the UBR report change the NEID column name to object ID, and the Object ID name it to NEP Object id ( NEP Part) – 2- Ensure if any DB view is using this Object ID , to point to NE ID field as in DB the column remain the same ( NEP part) |
| Comment by Srishti Kashyap [ 22/Sep/25 ] |
|
column name changed facing below problem please suggest: However, in the current XML input, the NEID format for UBR is appearing as 10.186.4.90_DL, which does not follow the expected convention and therefore fails validation, preventing the data from being imported. Could you please suggest how we should handle this case? Should the XML be corrected at source to match the expected NEID format, or do we need to relax/update the validation logic on our side? |
| Comment by Anonymous [ 23/Sep/25 ] |
|
Hi Dear, |
| Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 01/Oct/25 ] |
|
some object id in ubr report for cambium is showing blank please check , snapshot attached for your reference . |
| Comment by Khaled Khalil [ 07/Oct/25 ] |
|
Dear |
| Comment by Priyasha Tiwari [ 08/Oct/25 ] |
|
board report the object id is not correct , should be same as the object id for UBR node report. refer the screenshot attached . |